<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"><channel><title>Metadata on Shaowen Chen's Website</title><link>https://www.chenshaowen.com/en/tags/metadata/</link><description>Recent content in Metadata on Shaowen Chen's Website</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><copyright>&amp;copy;2016 - {year}, All Rights Reserved.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><sy:updatePeriod>weekly</sy:updatePeriod><atom:link href="https://www.chenshaowen.com/en/tags/metadata/atom.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Migrating JuiceFS Metadata from Redis to PGSQL</title><link>https://www.chenshaowen.com/en/blog/migrate-juicefs-metadata-from-redis-to-pgsql.html</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:modified>Mon, 12 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0000</atom:modified><guid>https://www.chenshaowen.com/en/blog/migrate-juicefs-metadata-from-redis-to-pgsql.html</guid><description>1. Why Migrate Metadata Storage from Redis to PGSQL PGSQL is cheaper Redis stores metadata in memory, while PGSQL stores metadata on disk, so the cost difference is obvious.
PGSQL performance is tunable Different PGSQL services offer different performance IOPS. If you do not have a continuously high performance requirement, PGSQL is a good choice.</description><dc:creator>WeChat Official Account</dc:creator><category>JuiceFS</category><category>Redis</category><category>PGSQL</category><category>Operations</category><category>Storage</category><category>Learning</category><category>Migration</category><category>Metadata</category><category>Troubleshooting</category></item></channel></rss>