<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"><channel><title>FIO on Shaowen Chen's Website</title><link>https://www.chenshaowen.com/en/tags/fio/</link><description>Recent content in FIO on Shaowen Chen's Website</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><copyright>&amp;copy;2016 - {year}, All Rights Reserved.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><sy:updatePeriod>weekly</sy:updatePeriod><atom:link href="https://www.chenshaowen.com/en/tags/fio/atom.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Why NFS Over RDMA Has Much Better FIO Large-Block Read Performance Than NFS</title><link>https://www.chenshaowen.com/en/blog/nfs-over-rdma-vs-nfs-fio-large-block-read-write-performance.html</link><pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:modified>Sun, 30 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0000</atom:modified><guid>https://www.chenshaowen.com/en/blog/nfs-over-rdma-vs-nfs-fio-large-block-read-write-performance.html</guid><description>1. Background While testing the performance of NFS Over RDMA, I found that reading a 4M file could actually reach 45GB/s.
1 2 3 fio -numjobs=128 -fallocate=none -iodepth=2 -ioengine=libaio -direct=1 -rw=read -bs=4M --group_reporting -size=100m -time_based -runtime=30 -name=fio-test -directory=/data1/nfs READ: bw=42.3GiB/s (45.4GB/s), 42.3GiB/s-42.3GiB/s (45.4GB/s-45.4GB/s), io=1269GiB (1363GB), run=30019-30019msec Yet the disk&amp;rsquo;s 4M multi-threaded read performance is only 6 GB/s.</description><dc:creator>WeChat Official Account</dc:creator><category>NFS</category><category>RDMA</category><category>FIO</category><category>Performance</category></item></channel></rss>